If you suspect plagiarism, data manipulation (such as duplicated western blot bands or unrealistic NMR baselines), or dual submission, your correct course of action is to inform the editor directly and confidentially in your cover letter, rather than accusing the authors in the report. 2. Evaluating Scientific Integrity and Methodology
: Each module contains "knowledge checks" and challenging exercises that mirror the types of questions found in the final assessment.
ACS provides a practice test. Run through it twice. If you still struggle, your institutional librarian or PI can access official answer keys—but asking them to teach you is better than cheating. acs reviewer lab final assessment answers
Focus on high-level scientific issues first (e.g., faulty logic, inadequate controls, incorrect mechanistic assumptions).
– For instance, in the long paper module, ACS often expects you to recognize: If you suspect plagiarism, data manipulation (such as
Check if the authors noted hazardous procedures or highly toxic reagents clearly in the methods section.
Review the .
Communicating constructive feedback politely and professionally, avoiding personal attacks.
Dealing with potential plagiarism, data fabrication, or salami-slicing (breaking one study into multiple smaller papers). 2. Technical Quality Assessment ACS provides a practice test
Evaluating if the work presents a significant advancement to the field.